
              128kb/s ASF Frequency Response
            
              128kb/s ASF Spectral View
            Here we have the results of testing the Microsoft 
              Audio Codec version 1 at 128kb/s. As WinAmp now has Windows Media 
              support it was used to capture the output to a wave file.
            You can see that the frequency response is faithfully 
              reproduced up to nearly 16kHz but is slightly suppressed above this. 
            
            The spectral graph also shows plenty of content right 
              up to 22kHz. You can see how some lower intensity content has been 
              pruned down to about 12kHz. There are some other noteworthy observations 
              that can be made about the spectral graph as well. 
            The spectral graph of the source material shows LESS 
              high frequency content above 20kHz than the ASF file. This would 
              indicate to me there are a lot of distortion components in the ASF 
              output signal. 
            Comparing the bright vertical bars in the spectral 
              view where the trumpet notes are playing to the source material 
              graph is very revealing. You will see that the bars in the ASF file 
              are much broader than in the reference material's plot. There is 
              quite a lot of pre and post transient material being added.
            Listening tests also reveal the shortcomings of encoding 
              with this codec. The sound is slightly fuzzy and transients lack 
              definition. The valve noises from the trumpet are heard as clicks 
              and don't sound like the original at all. Stereo imaging is also 
              not well defined.
            There is no doubt that a 128kb/s MP3 file sounds better 
              than the ASF file. At very low bitrates though the Microsoft codec 
              performs a lot better on sound quality than MP3. 
            The one impressive feature of this codec is its encoding 
              speed. My machine could quite easily encode the file at faster than 
              real time at 128kb/s. This means that the format would be a good 
              choice for streaming high quality live content. We are likely to 
              see some refinement in the encoder as it is still a very new format.
            The CPU overhead of about 23% for playback on my machine 
              is almost identical to MP3 at this rate.
            [Back] [Next]